The tax trap whose bite is worse than its bark

Pension rules are increasingly complex, with the cost of getting it wrong often punishing. Atticus Kidd explains the rules around the annual allowance and highlights the risks of inaction.

by Atticus Kidd

Wealth Planner

When discussing pension contributions one of the primary considerations is the annual allowance. The annual allowance is the most you and your employer can save into your pension within a tax year before you are required to pay tax on those contributions. Depending on your taxable income, the excess pension savings can be charged to tax in whole or in part at 45%, 40% or 20%. 

In the 2020/21 tax year the annual allowance stands at £40,000. However, there are limits to the tax-relievable contributions that can be paid. For personal contributions, you are permitted to make contributions of up to the greater of £3,600 or 100% of your annual earnings each tax year, capped at the annual allowance, in order to receive tax relief on them. However, your annual allowance may be reduced if you have either flexibly accessed your pension pot previously, or you have a high income.

This is a complex issue and one that could be detrimental to your long term financial planning

To focus on the latter point, as of the 6th of April 2016, a tapered annual allowance was introduced for higher earners, for which an individual’s annual allowance was reduced by £1 for every £2 of adjusted income over £150,000 provided your threshold income did not also exceed £110,000. Adjusted income broadly being all taxable income plus employer pension contributions and threshold income broadly being all taxable income, less personal pension contributions. 

However, as of the 2020/21 tax year, the rules changed in which for every £2 of adjusted income over £240,000, an individual’s annual allowance is reduced by £1. The threshold income also received an increase going from £110,000 to £200,000. A generous £90,000 increase on the previous amount which has served as good news to many who were previously restricted by this taper but will still serve as a bane to some. Unfortunately, for higher earners still impacted by the taper, the minimum tapered annual allowance was reduced from £10,000 to £4,000. This means that anyone with an adjusted income of £312,000 or above is now restricted to an annual allowance of only £4,000. 

Complex tax trap

The calculation of annual allowance for higher earners can be the source of some confusion as there are numerous elements at play and, as a minimum, an individual would be required to know their income amounts chargeable to income tax and pension savings (including employer contributions) for the relevant tax year. This can be particularly troublesome for those with variable income arising from multiple sources. The consequences of not being aware of these amounts could be a tax charge known as the annual allowance charge. In order to calculate the charge applicable the total gross amount that has been contributed to pensions in excess of your annual allowance is added to your income for the year and then income tax is applied. For earners in excess of the £240,000 threshold this would likely be 45%. This charge will be payable by the individual even in the case where the annual allowance has been exceeded through employer contributions. Subject to certain conditions it is possible to have the charge paid from your pension however, this is still not a situation many people would wish to find themselves in.

A tax trap that is ensnaring individuals due to its complexity

If you believe that you may be subject to the tapered annual allowance and as a consequence be subject to an annual allowance charge it is important to check with your accountant who will be able to work out your annual allowance and help you adjust your contributions accordingly. We have seen numerous high income individuals incur a large annual allowance tax charge as they were under the assumption they could pay in £40,000 and were restricted by this tapering.  It is a tax trap that is ensnaring individuals due to its complexity, and often it is clients who do not employ the services of an accountant who fall foul of the rules. 

It might be possible to carry forward any unused allowances from the previous three tax years. Ultimately, this is a complex issue and one that could be detrimental to your long term financial planning were you to incur a large unanticipated tax charge however, this can easily be amended by proper and regular surveillance and seeking help from appropriately qualified individuals.

The information provided in this article is of a general nature. It is not a substitute for specific advice with regard to your own circumstances.

Illustration by Adam Mallett

Understanding Finance

Helping clients understand what we do is key to building relationships. To explain some of the industry jargon that creeps into our world, we’ve pulled together a section of our site to help.

Planning for your financial future

Wealth planning services

Also in this issue

With Tesla’s stock price increasing more than seven-fold in 2020 and stellar gains for some solar-energy equities, many investors are asking whether shares in companies linked to the green revolution…

Whilst Governments and Central Banks around the world have acted quickly to mitigate some of the consequences of the COVID-19 crisis, we are all too well aware that those investors looking for income…

James Radcliffe, a partner at Womble Bond Dickinson, looks at a regularly overlooked exemption that could enhance the value of your legacy for your beneficiaries.

Spring Issue Thirty Four